发布者认证信息(营业执照和身份证)未完善,请登录后完善信息登录
总算明白托福阅读原题内容分享

爱品网

爱品网 IPNO.CN

b2b免费推广平台

扫扫有惊喜

 
 
 
当前位置: 首页 > 供应 » 教育培训 »总算明白托福阅读原题内容分享
 

总算明白托福阅读原题内容分享

点击图片查看原图
起订:
供货总量:
发货期限: 自买家付款之日起 天内发货
所在地: 湖北
有效期至: 长期有效
最后更新: 2021-11-25 15:38
浏览次数: 103
在线咨询
 
总算明白托福阅读原题内容分享 详细说明

  今天小编为大家带来“托福阅读原文原题内容分享”,希望对大家有所帮助。同学们要认真掌握哦!下面跟随小编一起学习吧!
  Industrialization in the Netherlands and Scandinavia
  While some European countries, such as England and Germany, began to industrialize in the eighteenth century, the Netherlands and the Scandinavian countries of Denmark, Norway, and Sweden developed later. All four of these countries lagged considerably behind in the early nineteenth century. However, they industrialized rapidly in the second half of the century, especially in the last two or three decades. In view of their later start and their lack of coal undoubtedly the main reason they were not among the early industrializers it is important to understand the sources of their success.
  All had small populations. At the beginning of the nineteenth century, Denmark and Norway had fewer than 1 million people, while Sweden and the Netherlands had fewer than 2.5 million inhabitants. All exhibited moderate growth rates in the course of the century (Denmark the highest and Sweden the lowest), but all more than doubLED in population by 1900. Density varied greatly. The Netherlands had one of the highest population densities in Europe, whereas Norway and Sweden had the lowest Denmark was in between but closer to the Netherlands.
  Considering human capital as a characteristic of the population, however, all four countries were advantaged by the large percentages of their populations who could read and write. In both 1850 and 1914, the Scandinavian countries had the highest literacy rates in Europe, or in the world, and the Netherlands was well above the European average. This fact was of enormous value in helping the national economies find their niches in the evolving currents of the international economy.
  Location was an important factor for all four countries. All had immediate access to the sea, and this had important implications for a significant international resource, fish, as well as for cheap transport, merchant marines, and the shipbuilding industry. Each took advantage of these opportunities in its own way. The people of the Netherlands, with a long tradition of fisheries and mercantile shipping, had difficulty in developing good harbors suitable for steamships: eventually they did so at Rotterdam and Amsterdam, with exceptional results for transit trade with Germany and central Europe and for the processing of overseas foodstuffs and raw materials (sugar, tobacco, chocolate, grain, and eventually oil). Denmark also had an admirable commercial history, particularly with respect to traffic through the Sound (the strait separating Denmark and Sweden). In 1857, in return for a payment of 63 million kronor from other commercial nations, Denmark abolished the Sound toll dues the fees it had collected since 1497 for the use of the Sound. This, along with other policy shifts toward free trade, resulted in a significant increase in traffic through the Sound and in the port of Copenhagen.
  The political institutions of the four countries posed no significant barriers to industrialization or economic growth. The nineteenth century passed relatively peacefully for these countries, with progressive democratization taking place in all of them. They were reasonably well governed, without notable corruption or grandiose state projects, although in all of them the government gave some aid to railways, and in Sweden the state built the main lines. As small countries dependent on foreign markets, they followed a liberal trade policy in the main, though a protectionist movement developed in Sweden. In Denmark and Sweden agricultural reforms took place gradually from the late eighteenth century through the first half of the nineteenth, resulting in a new class of peasant landowners with a definite market orientation.
  The key factor in the success of these countries (along with high literacy, which contributed to it) was their ability to adapt to the international division of labor determined by the early industrializers and to stake out areas of specialization in international markets for which they were especially well suited. This meant a great dependence on international commerce, which had notorious fluctuations; but it also meant high returns to those factors of production that were fortunate enough to be well placed in times of prosperity. In Sweden exports accounted for 18 percent of the national income in 1870, and in 1913, 22 percent of a much larger national income. In the early twentieth century, Denmark exported 63 percent of its agricultural production: butter, pork products, and eggs. It exported 80 percent of its butter, almost all to Great Britain, where it accounted for 40 percent of British butter imports.
  Paragraph 1: While some European countries, such as England and Germany, began to industrialize in the eighteenth century, the Netherlands and the Scandinavian countries of Denmark, Norway, and Sweden developed later. All four of these countries lagged considerably behind in the early nineteenth century. However, they industrialized rapidly in the second half of the century, especially in the last two or three decades. In view of their later start and their lack of coal undoubtedly the main reason they were not among the early industrializers it is important to understand the sources of their success.
  1. Paragraph 1 supports which of the following ideas about England and Germany
  They were completely industrialized by the start of the nineteenth century.
  They possessed plentiful supplies of coal.
  They were overtaken economically by the Netherlands and Scandinavia during the early nineteenth century.
  They succeeded for the same reasons that the Netherlands and Scandinavia did.
  Paragraph 2: All had small populations. At the beginning of the nineteenth century, Denmark and Norway had fewer than 1 million people, while Sweden and the Netherlands had fewer than 2.5 million inhabitants. All exhibited moderate growth rates in the course of the century (Denmark the highest and Sweden the lowest), but all more than doubled in population by 1900. Density varied greatly. The Netherlands had one of the highest population densities in Europe, whereas Norway and Sweden had the lowest Denmark was in between but closer to the Netherlands.
  Paragraph 3: Considering human capital as a characteristic of the population, however, all four countries were advantaged by the large percentages of their populations who could read and write. In both 1850 and 1914, the Scandinavian countries had the highest literacy rates in Europe, or in the world, and the Netherlands was well above the European average. This fact was of enormous value in helping the national economies find their niches in the evolving currents of the international economy.
  2. Paragraph 2 suggests which of the following about the importance of population density in the industrialization of the Netherlands and Scandinavia It was a more important factor than population size.
  It was more influential than the rate of population growth.
  It was more important in the early stages than it was later.
   It was not a significant factor.
  3. According to paragraphs 2 and 3, which of the following contributed significantly to the successful economic development of the Netherlands and of Scandinavia
   The relatively small size of their populations T
  he rapid rate at which their populations were growing
  The large amount of capital they had available for investment
   The high proportion of their citizens who were educated
  Paragraph 4:
  Location was an important factor for all four countries. All had immediate access to the sea, and this had important implications for a significant international resource, fish, as well as for cheap transport, merchant marines, and the shipbuilding industry. Each took advantage of these opportunities in its own way. The people of the Netherlands, with a long tradition of fisheries and mercantile shipping, had difficulty in developing good harbors suitable for steamships: eventually they did so at Rotterdam and Amsterdam, with exceptional results for transit trade with Germany and central Europe and for the processing of overseas foodstuffs and raw materials (sugar, tobacco, chocolate, grain, and eventually oil). Denmark also had an admirable commercial history, particularly with respect to traffic through the Sound (the strait separating Denmark and Sweden). In 1857, in return for a payment of 63 million kronor from other commercial nations, Denmark abolished the Sound toll dues the fees it had collected since 1497 for the use of the Sound. This, along with other policy shifts toward free trade, resulted in a significant increase in traffic through the Sound and in the port of Copenhagen.


总算明白托福阅读原题内容分享是勤学思教育网的主要产品,我们的产品负责人是张生,有需要的朋友请直接拨打我的电话13988888888,我们的地址是勤学思教育网,期待与您的合作!
免责声明:[总算明白托福阅读原题内容分享]信息是由该公司[勤学思教育网]自行发布,该企业负责信息内容的真实性、准确性和合法性。[爱品网]仅列示上述信息,上述信息描述仅代表信息发布日的情况,不担保该信息的准确性,完整性和及时性,也不承担浏览者的任何商业风险。
本产品网址 : https://www.ipno.cn/xiaoshou/i326510.html 可发送到QQ/微信/微博/博客等平台来推广此信息
 

公司信息

企业级别:VIP [VIP第1年] 指数:2

联 系 人:张生(先生) 

公司电话: 13988888888

所在地区:湖北

公司地址:勤学思教育网

 

网站首页 | 付款方式 | 关于我们 | 信息删除 | 联系方式 | 服务条款 | 版权隐私 | 网站地图 | 专题 | 排名推广 | 广告服务 | 积分换礼 | 网站留言 | RSS订阅 | 鄂ICP备14015623号-2

爱品网是一个开放的平台,信息全部为用户自行注册发布!并不代表本网赞同其观点或证实其内容的真实性,需用户自行承担信息的真实性,图片及其他资源的版权责任! 本站不承担此类作品侵权行为的直接责任及连带责任。

如若本网有任何内容侵犯您的权益,请联系: 473199705@QQ.COM

©2012-2021爱品网 免费信息发布平台,免费推广平台,免费B2B网站爱品网 www.ipno.cn
免责声明:本站所有信息由各公司自行发布,请在交易前确认真实合法性,本站不承担任何交易及知识产权侵权的法律责任! 鄂公网安备 42018502005275