下面小编跟大家一起了解A类雅思大作文7分范文及解析，希望对大家的学习有所帮助。
　　观点类大作文社会类话题
　　Somepeople think government should focus on reducing environment pollution and housing problem to help people prevent illness and disease. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

　　题目大意
　　人们认为应该通过减少环境污染和解决住房问题来帮助人们预防疾病的发生，你是否同意？
　　写作思路
　　的环境治理策略和住房问题解决与人们的疾病预防没有直接关系，而这些问题确实有必要被进行关注。
　　没有关系：人们的疾病预防与环保和住房问题没有直接的关系。疾病预防的主要处理措施在于医疗设施的安全与完善，对于可预见疾病产生的合理规划，人们健康生活习惯的培养等一系列能够防止人们生命的直接治理措施，而将环境保护和住房问题作为解决疾病问题的主要方案本身是极其荒谬的。即便有人认为如果不进行环境破坏问题的干预有可能导致人们的疾病，或是由于住房空间和可利用住房的减少可能会对人们的身体产生影响，那也是相当间接的联系，而不能将解决这些问题作为达成疾病预防目的的主要措施。
　　纵使这样，环境治理和住房问题的确应该获得的关注。一方面，这些问题成为了现代社会的主要问题——环境污染逐渐破坏了人类物种文明的生态持续性，而住房的紧张也使得人们的生活基本需求获得了威胁，而解决这些基本需求问题的确是一个迫切的社会需求。而另一方面，对于此类问题的干预要从大多数情况下优于其他非组织，一方面，强大的公信力和宏观调控能力使得更有能力对于环境和住房问题进行大规模的改善，另一方面，解决社会问题所站有的宏观视角也或多或少比其他任何一种非组织或个体更能保证问题的公允和全面覆盖。
　　提纲
　　高分范文
　　There is certainly no direct link between the settlement of environmental and housing problems and the prevention of public illness; I would argue in this article for the irrationality of absurdly bonding them together despite the necessity of government in releasing the pollution and residential pressures.
　　Thepreventionofpeople’s illness or disease is notintuitively correlated to the environment pollution or the problems related to real estate, but based on howthe hygiene and medical care aredevelopedwithin a location. Though these two areas, namely the housing condition and environment situation, do have an effect on the type and the amount of illness one may get, it is the extent of the medical treatment that can make differences on avoiding health problems to happen. The nature of the public health, should notever be addressed without the fundamental health care system, the high-quality physicians or the related infrastructures, by just relying on the better living surroundings or the good dwelling conditions. The indirect link between the two factors, ergo, makes the causality of the topic unreasonable.
　　Whereas there are still necessities for the government to build up focuses on the problems exhibited in the prompt. Apart from the possibilities that may lead to adverse effect on the public health, the plague of the ecosystem and the limitation on people’s living conditions have already been a part of the dark scenario of human future prophecy: millions of species are endangered because of the blight on their habitats and of the climate change; people are also withstanding pressures on their residential places, bearing with high bank loans, fearing of the over-crowded living sPACes. Those problems, no matter how closely they are related to people’s illness or diseases, cry out for immediate solutions, and that means government should behave in their roles, decisively and obligatorily, not only because of their wide influence—after all, they are the supreme power in the overwhelming locations—which has the ability to effectively solve the problem in macro-control or other law setting means, but also of thefactthatthey are, or should I say they should be the most unbiased sector in dealing with environmental and housing problems in caring about the most people by no misguidance of economic or individual elements.
　　In conclusion, government, indeed, is supposed to focus on the proper solutions dealing withthe pollution and the accommodation, but the prevention of health concerns should not be done by doing those actions, but investing more on medical care.