下面小编跟大家一起了解雅思大作文7分范文及解析利弊类大作文社会类话题分享，希望对大家的学习有所帮助，
　　In many countries today, people in cities either live alone or in small family units, rather than in large, extended family groups. Is this a positive or negative trend?
　　六月写作大范围预测与6月22日雅思写作小范围预测题库，请直接转发本推文至朋友圈并保存10分钟以上截图发送到后台领取哦~
　　题目大意
　　现在很多国家的城市里的人们选择独居或组成很小的家庭以取代庞大家庭群体而生活，这是一个积极还是消极的发展？
　　这道题又是前不久情报圈发过的范文及解析~所以说，平时的积累真的很重要啊！传送门：
　　本周一刚刚给大家发过的近期高频范文20篇中也有类似考题及范文~有图为证！！！领过的同学可以自行验证哦~
　　音频解析
　　写作思路
　　除了之前的思维，本文还可以从不同城市特质或者程度的角度来想问题。
　　对于城市的发展来说，小家庭可能会带来的影响有：
　　积极：加强了城市的多元化和多样化，因为独居或小家庭意味着居住人员极大的自由度，可以应付有城市发展和变化带来的多种生活体系和模式——可以适应各种工作的需求以满足城市的经济必要性，可以适合于更小的城市建筑单元以满足缓解城市的住房问题。并且对于大城市来说，独居和小家庭意味着更大的迁徙性，使得人力资源更多流入蓬勃发展指向的城市。
　　消极：过于点状的家庭模式会带来过大的流动性和不稳定度。正是由于多样性，使得大多数人在城市居住生活中不再家庭的建立和养成，进而享受不到归属感，这种情愫一旦发展剧烈则会引发一系列问题：结婚率降低，离婚率提升，社会整体心态越发孤独。同时，大量的人口迁徙还会造成不同城市发展不平衡，或是提升由于大量人口迁徙所带来的犯罪问题等。
　　关键词
　　Peopleincity题目给定人群特性，则更多应从城市生活，城市人口特性等方面来考虑问题。
　　live alone or in small family units.尽量将独居和微小家庭结构同时涵盖。
　　rather than in large, extended family groups所有的优劣势都要与大家庭进行对比考虑
　　提纲
　　高分范文
　　Beforescrutinizingwhether living independently or insidea limited family range would bring about outweighing benefits or problems compared with the life in an extended community, one must first define the parameters so as to have a system of differentiation; development may appear diversely in individual lives.
　　Indeed, positives emerge when one chooses to live alone or starts a family with a small range of members, especially in the modern urban life, where persons are increasingly lacking of time and energy to maintain a traditional and relatively stable living. That is to say, solitaries, or nuclear families definitely enjoy more freedom than the great family groups; theyare designing and arranging their family livings dynamically based on their own purposes(or at most their couples’ and children’s) without caring about other dependents or close relatives. Fitness of this living style, ergo, is manifest among urban residents who are occupied always in their ever-changing living, socializing and working conditions. It is also a saving of vigor that no complicated family ties are binding persons living on their own or in small families: no need for one to concern about whether one should be closer or relatively distanton formingtheir relations with a relative; no pressureor guiltyis sensed if one wants to be indolent so as to do nothing after going back home. Energy and time are therefore used more reasonably for peopledevotingmore into their careers or studies in today’s city on what they should focus more on.
　　Situationssometimes go adversely, however, if solitude or minute family structure is adopted instead of kinship ones by those without well-rounded abilities to manage the real-life details or struggling with life under financial burdens. Flexibility of a family life may also provoke instability and irregularity to the members—they somewhat need to acquire more capabilities to face problems and to undertakemore ventures when there are only restricted holders within a domestic environment.
　　Disorders are more likely to happen in this circumstance once there is emergency; no additional one would help to deal with issues overwhelming the whole family. Economic pressures may also prevail when fewer individuals have to weave everything into the fabrics of the entire household. Notwithstanding lower costs that are involved in feeding the members, increased expenditureson ranging from housing to instruments，which are far higher than consumptionson daily intakes, necessarily needed in the daily routines mostly are covered solely by a particular person of couple, rather than shared by distributedusers under a sharing roof; hardships may even overmatch happiness among dwellers in highly evolving cities.
　　In conclusion, I would very much agree that thebalanceof edges and weaknesses are highly recommended by integrating individual properties and visual angles in dialectically seeing the current family life; situations vary greatly between people chasing for family maneuverability together with simpler interpersonal relations and the one hardly handling their lives or caring more about monetary family operation.
　　相关词汇
　　Scrutinize 认真审视
　　Parameter决定因素
　　Solitary独居者
　　Nuclearfamily小家庭
　　Dynamically机动地
　　Dependent亲属
　　Ergo因此
　　Vigor精力
　　Bind绑定
　　Indolent懒惰
　　Solitude独居的
　　Domesticenvironment家庭环境
　　Disorder紊乱
　　Prevail成为主要问题
　　Expenditure花销
　　Overmatch超过
　　Dweller城市居住者
　　Dialectically辨证地
　　Maneuverability机动性
　　?end?